CUTraw files
inventoried at intake
SIMULATED SAMPLE / INTERNAL BENCHMARKOne messy site folder.
One messy site folder.
A finished closeout.
We built a fictional 3-sector modernization job, seeded 18 known problems, and ran the full CutClose workflow from raw intake through independent final QA.
Fictional contractor, customer and site. Not customer work. No carrier acceptance or engineering certification is claimed.
SIMULATED SAMPLE / INTERNAL BENCHMARK — NOT CUSTOMER RESULTSThe requirement set is fictional. The workflow, artifacts and scoring are real outputs from this exercise.
WHAT HAPPENED
The workflow found the gaps.
The first structured pass found 17 of 18 seeded deficiencies. A separate final QA pass found the last one. One initial false positive was cleared by human review.
requirements
converted into trackable rows
seeded defects
found before simulated delivery
open items
after one correction round
Internal simulated benchmark — not customer performance data. No time-savings result was produced because we did not run a controlled manual baseline.
THE JOBFrom folder dump
From folder dump
to reconciled file.
- 01
Inventory 118 files
Photos, PDFs, test records, spreadsheets, duplicates and one corrupted file.
- 02
Build 64 requirement rows
General closeout conventions separated from fictional Northstar-specific rules.
- 03
Match and challenge evidence
Presence, identity, readability, duplication and cross-document consistency checked.
- 04
Return one correction list
Each issue tied to a requirement, requested action and resolution record.
- 05
Assemble, then review again
Package production and independent final QA handled as separate passes.
THE DEFICIENCY REPORTOpen the deficiency register ↗
“Present” was not treated as “proven.”
Files were checked against the thing they were supposed to prove. That exposed missing, mislabeled, contradictory and unreadable evidence that a folder count would miss.
MissingRequired photos and a Gamma sweep report
WrongSite ID, sector, drawing revision and equipment tag
UnclearSerials, grounding detail and cropped labels
ConflictingSerials, completion dates and Alpha orientation evidence
BrokenOne corrupted OTDR report and duplicated grounding evidence
THE OUTPUTNot a dashboard.
Not a dashboard.
A file your PM can send.
The final package reconciles site administration, overall photos, three sectors, grounding and power, test reports, as-builts, punch closure and final QA.
- Package revision
- R1
- Requirements complete
- 64 / 64
- Final QA
- Separate pass
- Open at simulated delivery
- 0
WHERE PEOPLE STAY IN THE LOOPSoftware organizes.
Software organizes.
People verify.
Twenty-four targeted human tasks remained. The operator confirmed things software should not silently assume.
Can the evidence be trusted?
Serial readability, label identity, framing, distinct sector photos and whether the claimed connection is actually visible.
Do the records agree?
Site IDs, sectors, equipment models, serials, completion dates and document revisions checked across files.
Who has the authority?
The Alpha orientation conflict went back to the contractor’s technical authority. CutClose did not make the engineering decision.
OPEN THE WORK
Every major deliverable.
No fake dashboard screenshot. These are the actual files produced by the simulated project.
01PDF · 11.7 MB↗02PDF · 5 pages↗03XLSX↗04XLSX↗05ZIP · 6 workbooks↗
Finished sample COP
26-page customer-facing closeout package
Final QA report
Independent review completed after package assembly
Requirements matrix
The 64-row fictional Northstar requirement set
Deficiency report
All 18 seeded findings and their final disposition
Working registers
Intake, matching, QA, deficiencies and revision logs
THE BOUNDARY
Closeout QA is not engineering approval.
CutClose checks whether the required documentation is present, legible, correctly identified, internally consistent and assembled to the supplied structure.
Technical limits, installation compliance, RF acceptance and engineering conclusions remain with the contractor, customer or qualified authority.
See how CutClose works →